Back to Reference Strategic Horizon

Strategic Horizon

Rolling view: 3 months back → now → 6 months forward Last updated: March 3, 2026


Strategic Arcs

Multi-month initiatives tracked as narrative threads. Each arc represents a question the portfolio is trying to answer over 6-18 months.

1. Scaling Without Me

Phase: Early proof → Building pipeline | Horizon: 18 months

Can workshops run without Reuben in the room — and still be good? This is the existential question for the capacity building model. The answer so far is yes, with caveats.

Where it stands now: Two independent facilitators are running sessions (Courtney Garza at TCEA, Anna-Lena in Paris). Gregory Wilson is beginning Build-a-Bot facilitator training (first walkthrough Mar 3). ISTE partnership scoping is complete — train-the-trainer for 3 ISTE faculty is the next concrete step. CRM re-engagement (5 drafted emails to stale facilitators) is blocked on model clarity.

The key question right now: What does quality look like when someone else runs it? The ISTE partnership will be the first real test of a formalized train-the-trainer pathway. Gregory’s training is the first Build-a-Bot-specific version.

Next milestone: Gregory completes facilitator training and runs a session (target: Tinkery Flash Lab, Mar 30). ISTE TTT terms formalized.


2. Research Validation

Phase: Experiments running | Horizon: 12 months

Can Build-a-Bot and Flash Lab be validated through research — not just testimonials? The portfolio has strong anecdotal evidence (“I made a thing!”) but thin research evidence.

Where it stands now: Three research-adjacent threads are active. LabGPT is Cathy’s pilot study testing two conditions (Critic vs. Co-designer) — a real RCT using Build-a-Bot platform architecture. Health Coach Bot (Marily Oppezzo / Michele Patel) is reactivating — if they get a grant, it validates Build-a-Bot as a research tool, not just a workshop activity. Colombia chatbot (Ana Saavedra) ran its school study and is in data export/wrap-up.

The key question right now: Will any of these produce a publishable result or a funded grant application that names Build-a-Bot as infrastructure? Marily’s connection to dean Dan Schwartz makes Health Coach Bot politically visible even beyond its research value.

Next milestone: Health Coach Bot meeting (Mar 3) — clarify research direction. LabGPT study runs (Mar 4, Mar 9) — condition guardrails tested. Colombia data exported and thread closed.


3. Revenue Model

Phase: First pricing experiment | Horizon: 12 months

What’s the sustainable funding model? Josh’s three pillars (Playbook, Reach, Revenue) demand a pricing answer. The Feb 25 ISTE meeting was the first time pricing was discussed in a real partnership conversation.

Where it stands now: Market research is done — $5K baseline for a facilitated session, $15K-$25K for a TTT cohort. ISTE is the test case for an “authorized provider” model. But no money has changed hands yet. The question of whether this flows through OTL, through a Stanford entity, or through ISTE directly is unresolved.

The key question right now: Will ISTE agree to terms that include revenue? And what’s the institutional mechanism — OTL licensing, direct contract, or something else? Isabelle is pursuing the OTL + dean conversation.

Next milestone: ISTE partnership terms formalized (target: March). First revenue data point from any partnership engagement (target: June).


4. International Reach

Phase: Signals confirmed, pipeline unbuilt | Horizon: 18 months

Is demand beyond the US real — and can it be served without burning out? Oman, Paris, Colombia, and Australia all represent genuine interest, but each was opportunistic rather than systematic.

Where it stands now: Oman delivered (Feb 2-5) with strong feedback and a whitepaper follow-up thread. Anna-Lena runs independently in Paris (peak [MULTIPLIER]). Colombia study completed. Australia (Kelly/Churchill) is still back-burner. LAUSD Foundation meeting (Mar 19) is domestic but represents district-level scale.

The key question right now: Is the international play “we train people who then serve their own regions” (the Anna-Lena model) or “we deliver internationally” (the Oman model)? The first scales; the second doesn’t.

Next milestone: CRM re-engagement includes Spyros at RMIT (2,000 students, March/April window closing). Self-service toolkit maturity (designkit.stanford.edu + bot101.app) determines whether the Anna-Lena model can replicate without direct training.


5. Seed Grant Ecosystem

Phase: Framework built, execution starting | Horizon: Ongoing

Can the seed grant lifecycle (SPARK → BUILD → SHARPEN → SCALE) become a real curriculum spine — not just a diagram? The Three C’s framework (Critical Boost, Capacity Building, Cross-Pollination) mapped beautifully onto the four phases, but most of the proposed offerings haven’t been built yet.

Where it stands now: SCALE phase is well-covered (4 workshops in 12 months: Scaling Sustainably, Partnerships as Pathways, Legal 101, Comms Workshop planned Mar). The middle phases (BUILD/SHARPEN) have two proposals each but none delivered. Cross-cohort offerings (Legal 101) proved the model — pulling seed grantees, tEquity, and Create+AI into one room worked.

The key question right now: Which 1-2 new offerings from the lifecycle framework should be prioritized for Q2? And who co-facilitates them? The seed grants themselves are going quiet (DeVeaux stalled, King ambiguous, Fan/Forssell low-touch), which threatens Goal 1’s tag coverage target.

Next milestone: Comms Workshop delivered (Joe lead, Mar 2026). Decision on Q2 offerings at a Josh 1:1. DeVeaux formally marked inactive.


Monthly Themes

December 2025 — “Building the Foundation”

The month before liftoff. CRM views were built, dashboard infrastructure expanded, Build-a-Bot start messages refined, and the Colombia chatbot took shape for Ana’s school testing. Oman prep consumed the second half. Beneath the surface: the shift from “I do workshops” to “I build systems that enable workshops” was becoming visible — designkit.stanford.edu launched, bot101.app crossed 1,000 bots, and the facilitator pipeline concept started forming.

Key decisions: Committed to Oman trip. Paused Health Coach Bot and VFT iOS to make room.


January 2026 — “Setting the Table”

GPS goals finalized with Josh. Capacity analysis surfaced 18 active threads and recommended trimming to 14. Jury duty week (Jan 26-31) created unexpected thinking time. CRM re-engagement campaign planned (5 priority contacts drafted). Vanessa Monterosa call opened the NewSchools thread. Anna-Lena debriefed her Paris Flash Labs — researchers preferred “Research Design” framing over “Build.”

The real theme: articulating what the work is. Josh kept asking “What’s your model?” — the question that would drive February’s strategic push.

Key decisions: Crystal Springs removed. VFT iOS paused. Health Coach Bot paused. Five CRM re-engagement emails drafted.


February 2026 — “The Model Takes Shape”

The breakthrough month. Oman Hackathon delivered (week 1). AI+Education Summit attended (week 2). Legal 101 ran as the first cross-cohort offering (week 3). ISTE partnership meeting hit a major milestone with Joseph South and Isabelle (week 4).

Strategically: the Three C’s framework mapped to a seed grant lifecycle (SPARK → BUILD → SHARPEN → SCALE). The capacity building model doc answered Josh’s “What’s your model?” question with three pillars: Playbook, Reach, Revenue. Market research on 9 comparable orgs grounded the pricing conversation. The Personal Logic Model emerged as a reflective practice artifact. Courtney Garza completed Build-a-Bot training, then took the initiative to register and deliver it at TCEA on her own — strongest scaling proof point yet.

Key decisions: ISTE pivoted from 60-min session to train-the-trainer. $5K baseline pricing proposed. Three personas framework (Instructional Practices, Contextual Curiosity, Identity) crystallized post-workshop pathways.


March 2026 — “Testing the Model” (current)

The model built in February meets reality. Gregory Wilson begins Build-a-Bot facilitator training (first formal walkthrough). Health Coach Bot reactivates with strategic framing (research validation + dean connection). LabGPT condition guardrails get built for Cathy’s study. ISTE follow-ups and due diligence continue. LAUSD Foundation meeting (Mar 19) could open district-level Flash Lab demand.

March is dense: 20 active threads (up from 18 despite 4 completions), a Stanford trip at month-end (Tinkery Mar 30, Lake Forest Mar 31 - Apr 1), and key decisions pending on CRM timing, King/Our Voice ownership, and Health Coach Bot scope.

Key questions this month: Does Gregory’s facilitator training work? What does Marily’s research direction look like? Can ISTE terms be formalized? Is LAUSD real?


April 2026 — “Facilitators in the Field” (forward look)

If March goes well, April is when facilitators start running sessions. ISTE TTT Week 1 (Reuben runs train-the-trainer). Tinkery toolkit v1 lands (Gregory collaboration). Lake Forest / PLEX visit happens (Christine partnership). DeepLearning.AI Dev Day (Apr 28-29) provides industry perspective.

Watch for: Quality signals from Gregory’s first independent session. Whether ISTE facilitators are ready to co-facilitate by month-end. Health Coach Bot scope decision ripple effects.


May 2026 — “First Independent Sessions” (forward look)

ISTE facilitators co-facilitate their first Flash Lab with Reuben observing. NewSchools engagement (if Vanessa timeline holds). LabGPT/CRAFT protein synthesis RCT (May 5). This is the month where “Scaling Without Me” either works or exposes gaps.

Watch for: Quality of ISTE-facilitated sessions vs. direct delivery. Whether the self-serve toolkit is sufficient for new facilitators. Research results from LabGPT study.


June 2026 — “Revenue Signal” (forward look)

ISTE facilitators run their first fully independent session + debrief. First revenue data point from a partnership engagement. Mid-year capacity check: is the portfolio sustainable at current pace?

Watch for: The first dollar. Whether “independent” actually means independent or whether Reuben is still getting pulled in for support. End-of-Q3 goal assessment prep.


July 2026 — “Mid-Year Scorecard” (forward look)

Playbook/Reach/Revenue scorecard for Josh. Mid-year GPS review. Decision point: what arcs are working and what gets pruned? The 5 Questions exercise (from capacity building model doc) gets its first real-world answers.

Watch for: Facilitator retention — are trained facilitators running repeat sessions or was it one-and-done? International pipeline health.


August 2026 — “Scale or Stall” (forward look)

ISTE fall convening prep (90-educator kickoff, 1.5 day in-person). NewSchools Venture Fund engagement (if timeline holds). Annual goal deadline approaching. This is the month that determines whether the scaling model is real or aspirational.

Watch for: 8-10 trained facilitators target. 15-20 sessions by others target. Whether the “Scaling Without Me” arc has moved from proof-of-concept to operating model.


Arc × Month Matrix

Arc Dec ‘25 Jan ‘26 Feb ‘26 Mar ‘26 Apr ‘26 May ‘26 Jun ‘26 Jul ‘26 Aug ‘26
Scaling Without Me Toolkit live CRM drafted Courtney TCEA, ISTE scoping Gregory training, ISTE terms ISTE TTT, Tinkery v1 ISTE co-facilitation First independent Scorecard Fall convening
Research Validation Colombia building Colombia testing LabGPT conditions, ABCs use Health Coach Bot, LabGPT study CRAFT RCT prep LabGPT RCT (May 5) Results analysis Publications?
Revenue Model Market research, $5K baseline ISTE terms OTL process First revenue? Revenue review Pricing v2
International Reach Paris ongoing Anna-Lena debrief Oman delivered, whitepaper CRM re-engage? RMIT window Pipeline check Australia?
Seed Grant Ecosystem Low-touch Capacity analysis Lifecycle framework, Legal 101 Comms workshop Q2 offerings? Mid-point check-in New cohort? Curriculum review

Update cadence: Monthly (during end-of-month prep). Quick scan during weekly review. This is a personal strategic reflection artifact — narrative lens, not task list.

Source: reference/strategic-horizon.md